|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[desc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| I have a 970m in a laptop, and a r9 290x desktop, I ran version 3.30 on both, and got these results:
R9 290x:
Md5: 13043 Mh/sec
SHA1: 4704 Mh/sec
970M:
Md5: 6626 Mh/sec
SHA1: 2301 Mh/... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,437 |
03-07-2017, 05:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| wow, did not know it would account for 50% difference. The R9 290x is watercooled as well, so even more advantage, while the laptop is screaming :P
I am OCing the r9 290x to the most stable OC I c... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,437 |
03-07-2017, 05:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
| Did some googling, so yes the 970M has 1280 cores vs the R9 290x has 2816. That explains a lot. Clock speed is 924 vs 1000 on the R9 |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,437 |
03-07-2017, 05:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Update Wiki to include hashcat w/ combinator attack: 1 dic file only
Post: Update Wiki to include hashcat w/ combinator attac...
| Hi!
It clearly mentions on the oclhashcat that we need exactly 2 dictionary files for the combinator (combination) attack:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=oclhashcat
However, I have not ... |
|
r9290xocl |
User Contributions
|
2 |
6,218 |
02-20-2015, 07:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
Post: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
| Hi,
I am getting about 204 Kh/s for WPA2 on a R9 290x / Win 8.1
Using the --gpu-loops 4096 -n 32 speeds things up to about 225 Kh/s, but the video driver crashes after about a couple of minutes... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
7,236 |
02-18-2015, 06:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
Post: RE: R9 290x / WPA2 / gpu loops
|
philsmd Wrote: (02-18-2015, 11:56 AM)
--
Here you can read about the registry patch for windows:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=timeout_patch
--
I will try that tonight, thanks. |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
7,236 |
02-18-2015, 05:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: RE: What am I doing wrong??
| coolbry95: did you notice the "-a 1"
atom: in other words, under hashcat, I have to specify only 1 dic file.
That explains a lot already, but it still does not explain why its not working with ... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,800 |
02-20-2015, 07:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: RE: What am I doing wrong??
| I Confirm it works for hashcat with -a 1 and a single dic file
I tried 1.33 with ocl, same behavior with 2 dic files. I hope its not my PC acting up :P |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,800 |
02-20-2015, 07:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: What am I doing wrong??
| I created an MD5 hash for the word data123, placed the word "data" in dic1, and the "123" on dic2.
The hash is accurate, because it gets cracked with the best64 rule file and dic1.
C:\Users\Ab... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,800 |
02-20-2015, 06:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: What am I doing wrong??
Post: RE: What am I doing wrong??
| Restarted my PC, and everything was working fine, with exact same commands, dic, etc... Very weird. |
|
r9290xocl |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,800 |
02-23-2015, 03:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| hi!
I have my usual R9 290x (watercooled) and I was running benchmarks with version 3.30 and 3.40
Using latest AMD drivers: 17.2.1, Windows 10
The benchmarks on both the 3.30 and 3.40 cr... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-07-2017, 05:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| Also, the 3.30 seems faster than the 3.40 on my card:
3.30
Md5: 13043 Mh/sec
SHA1: 4704 Mh/sec
3.40:
Md5: 11208 Mh/sec
SHA1: 4044 Mh/sec |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-07-2017, 05:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| atom: any feedback regarding why the benchmark is crashing when it is reaching "scrypt"? This is happening for both 3.30 and 3.40
btw, the graph you provided proves that earlier versions of hashca... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-07-2017, 05:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| How can I report a potential bug or malfunction if my benchmark crashes as soon as it reaches scrypt for version 3.30 and 3.40?
Anything I can try to find out why, like older versions? Please help... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-08-2017, 01:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
|
atom Wrote: (03-08-2017, 09:54 AM)
--
I have seen the same error with AMDGPU-pro 16.40. This is a driver issue, not a hashcat issue.
--
I believe you, but why scrypt crashes, where as all the other ... |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-08-2017, 04:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
| Weird. I ran WPA and MD5 cracking all day without issues, so it seems that it is only limited to scrypt specifically. |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,315 |
03-10-2017, 05:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: Brute Force WPA2
| If we have a WPA2 handshake, and wanted to brute force it with -1 ?l?u?d for starters, but we dont know the length of the password, would this be a good start?
oclhashcat.exe -m 2500 -a 3 -1 ?l... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
02-18-2015, 07:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: RE: Brute Force WPA2
| I think what am looking for is, if it means: Start incrementing from 8 up to 12, given the custom char set of lower case, upper case, and digits
-i --incremement-min 8 --increment-max 12 -a 3 -a ?... |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
02-18-2015, 08:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute Force WPA2
Post: RE: Brute Force WPA2
| Sorry that was a typo, it was supposed to be -a 3 -1 ?l?u?d
Ahhh, so we still have to specify the mask ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1, even though we already have the --increment-max 12, correct? |
|
r9290xocl |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
02-18-2015, 08:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashcat 3.30 problems
Post: RE: Hashcat 3.30 problems
| My issue is similar to this thread, but with hashcat and CUDA in my case:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-4468.html |
|
r9290xocl |
hashcat
|
10 |
11,318 |
02-22-2017, 09:20 PM |
