|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum
[desc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat - Single worlist attack
Post: RE: oclHashcat - Single worlist attack
| I also join in lemon`s ask ! I think it will be very useful (unique for GPU) feature! |
|
vector |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
13,354 |
06-01-2010, 10:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat and memory
Post: RE: oclHashcat and memory
| Thanks to the author for the nice tool !
I have a question: What is the maximum supported dictionary size on VGA with 512MB RAM ? |
|
vector |
Hardware
|
7 |
22,888 |
05-14-2010, 09:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Geforce GS250
Post: RE: Geforce GS250
| What is GS250 ? May be you mean GTS250 ?
Rolf ~610M p/s on single MD5 - are you sure if we speak about GTS250;) |
|
vector |
Hardware
|
6 |
15,662 |
05-29-2010, 04:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Geforce GS250
Post: RE: Geforce GS250
| conito26 you can expect about ~450M/s with single MD5 and ~420M/s with 500 000 md5 hashes.
For vBulletin salted hashes ~160M/s with single hash and ~0,3M/s with 500 salted hashes.
You can get thes... |
|
vector |
Hardware
|
6 |
15,662 |
05-31-2010, 04:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat and memory
Post: RE: oclHashcat and memory
|
vector |
Hardware
|
7 |
22,888 |
06-01-2010, 07:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: HD6850 or GTX460 which is better for oclHashcat ?
Post: HD6850 or GTX460 which is better for oclHashcat ?
| I wonder HD6850 or GTX460 1Gb which is better for oclHashcat ? |
|
vector |
Hardware
|
5 |
15,862 |
10-29-2010, 05:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command line ?!
Post: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command line ?!
| I try these:
oclHashcat.exe -m 5 vb3_hashes.txt example.dict ?d
oclHashcat.exe -d 1 -n 8 -m 5 vb3_hashes.txt example.dict ?d
the hashes in vb3_hashes.txt are in format hash:salt
the pro... |
|
vector |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
30,389 |
05-14-2010, 11:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command line ?!
Post: RE: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command lin...
|
atom Wrote: (05-16-2010, 12:00 PM)
--
vector Wrote: (05-14-2010, 11:40 AM)
--
The result is no found passwords !? The same passwords but in MD5 are found ! What I do wrong ?
--
i dont see the prob... |
|
vector |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
30,389 |
05-17-2010, 10:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command line ?!
Post: RE: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command lin...
|
atom Wrote: (05-17-2010, 11:04 AM)
--
so i have currently no plans to add them.
--
lol, actually this is a very pity! |
|
vector |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
30,389 |
05-18-2010, 04:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command line ?!
Post: RE: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command lin...
| I have one more question - what is the maximum number of salted hashes that oclHashcat PRACTICAL supports in multihash work ?
I load ~96 000 hashes list and start brutõ-force attack but rec... |
|
vector |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
30,389 |
05-19-2010, 07:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
Post: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
| vBulletin md5(md5($pass).$salt) speed test:
WinXP 32bit,GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 511MB, 2000Mhz, 16MCU
Single hash - bruteforce:
IGHASHGPU v0.62: 185M/s
oclHashcat v0.19: 180M/s
EGB v1... |
|
vector |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,019 |
05-25-2010, 12:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
Post: RE: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
|
atom Wrote: (05-25-2010, 01:10 PM)
--
oclHashcat does not cache 1st md5($pass) which is why it can handle more than 500 salts.
--
Yes it can but there is serious problem with the speed decrease:
... |
|
vector |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,019 |
05-25-2010, 02:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Share your OpenCLHashcat speeds.
Post: RE: Share your OpenCLHashcat speeds.
| hops Can you test with 500k MD5 hash list ? |
|
vector |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
41 |
128,035 |
06-06-2010, 10:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
|
Code:
--
Threads...: 1
Speed.GPU1: 0/s (running)
Speed.GPU*: 0/s
Recovered.: 38/341185 Digests, 23/275278 Salts
Progress..: 0/98948190 (0.00%)
Running...: 3 mins, 42 secs
Estimate... |
|
vector |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,278 |
06-18-2010, 01:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
| So what`s the difference from the previous version ? ;)
Recovered.: 38
Progress..: 0/98948190 |
|
vector |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,278 |
06-18-2010, 02:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
|
atom Wrote: (06-18-2010, 02:44 PM)
--
in your case it is just slower than 1/s.
--
This can`t be true !
Code:
--
Threads...: 1
Speed.GPU1: 0/s (running)
Speed.GPU*: 0/s
Recovered.... |
|
vector |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,278 |
06-18-2010, 03:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
| If you think that this is normal - OK, you know better, I just want to help ...
Anyway the multihash Vbulletin attack with oclHashcat doesn`t seem really useful for the moment,at least for me. The Ha... |
|
vector |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,278 |
06-18-2010, 05:05 PM |
