Search Results
|
Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: 15k budget - how would you spend it?
Post: 15k budget - how would you spend it?
Well, i had an unusual request cross my desk yesterday. My boss wants to start doing password auditing (among other things) and gave me a budget of 15k to build a hashcat rig. So if you were in my p... |
|
XakEp |
Hardware
|
4 |
9,555 |
11-21-2013, 06:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: R9 390x question
Post: RE: R9 390x question
philsmd Wrote: (08-09-2015, 07:16 PM)
--
should be supported (even if not yet listed on the amd openCL compatible-GPU page)
Also see https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions... |
|
XakEp |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,399 |
08-09-2015, 07:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: R9 390x question
Post: R9 390x question
I noticed that the R9 390x is not in the list for compatible devices from the list in the sticky at the top of the forum (holy run on sentence Batman!). Is this card supported? The only thing I've bee... |
|
XakEp |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,399 |
08-09-2015, 07:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: R9 390x question
Post: RE: R9 390x question
I keep getting this error -
oclHashcat v1.36 starting...
WARNING: Hashfile 'F:\Hashcat\hash3.txt' in line 1 (098f6bcd4621d373cade4e832627
b4f6.J↕☺): Line-length exception
Parsed Hashes:... |
|
XakEp |
Hardware
|
7 |
11,399 |
08-09-2015, 07:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
Yeah, the choice of cards isn't ideal but when you're resource constrained...
So how can I measure RAM/VRAM? I'm not seeing anything in Task Manager that indicates that's an issue, and I'm able to ge... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
09-03-2019, 06:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual n...
I recently stood up a 4 GPU system, and noticed something strange. When I run a benchmark -
hashcat64.exe -b -m1000
Quote:
--
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
==========================... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-27-2019, 10:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
They're actually slower with -O
Quote:
--
Speed.#1.........: 6083.7 MH/s (4.21ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:196 Thr:1024 Vec:2
Speed.#2.........: 8256.4 MH/s (7.03ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:196 Thr:1024 Vec... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-27-2019, 11:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
For sanity's sake here's what version I'm running these with.
Quote:
--
hashcat (v5.1.0) starting in benchmark mode...
--
|
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-28-2019, 12:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
I'll boot it up and test different commands.
I'm only posting NTLM hashes, but I see the same issues across the board with other hash types with single hashes as well. Gimme a few and I'll have new d... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-28-2019, 05:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
Ok, new pass with w3 and no mask
Quote:
--
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Quit
Hash.Type........: NTLM
Hash.Target......: (redacted)
Time.Started.....: Wed Aug 28 10:50:32 2019 (20 se... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-28-2019, 07:04 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
Ho ho, progress!
Quote:
--
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: NTLM
Hash.Target......: (redacted)
Time.Started.....: Wed Aug 28 13:06:28 2019 (2 secs)
Tim... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-28-2019, 09:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
Ok, I've been putting in a lot of time to dink with this since my last reply and I have to admit I have no idea why this is getting such slow speeds with commands that ought to be working.
hashcat6... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-30-2019, 05:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
Well shoot.
Ok, then for fast hashes, what's the best way to get full acceleration for rule based attacks? I was playing with the hctune file for a few hours but didn't get any progress. |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-30-2019, 06:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
And as a side note, I do appreciate all the help/pointers in the thread. I know how aggravating it can be and I'm trying other things. I think my biggest issue is the "how" hashcat works on the back e... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-30-2019, 08:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
hashcat64.exe -m0 -a3 d:\hashlists\Random\Quillen.txt ?b?b?b?b?b?b?b -w4 -O
Quote:
--
hashcat (v5.1.0) starting...
* Device #1: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled.
This ... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-30-2019, 08:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
*smacks forehead*
I apologize, I thought I had already posted that.
Quote:
--
D:\hashcat>hashcat64.exe -b -m0
hashcat (v5.1.0) starting in benchmark mode...
Benchmarking uses hand-optimize... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-30-2019, 09:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
Yeah not sure what that's about. I was playing with the hctune file and couldn't get them to do anything but crater, but since I'm not exactly an expert in tweaking hashcat, that's hardly a surprise. |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-30-2019, 10:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
Adding ?b to the mask results in an Integer Overflow Detected in Keyspace of Mask error. So that's a no go. |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-30-2019, 10:04 PM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
Ok, so I've been doing a LOT of testing and have a mask attack at this speed now -
Quote:
--
Speed.#1.........: 40525.5 MH/s (8.24ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:512 Thr:256 Vec:4
Speed.#2.........: 2947... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-31-2019, 02:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
undeath Wrote: (08-30-2019, 09:41 PM)
--
I'd guess the mask is still too short and doesn't provide enough work. Numbers are pretty close to the benchmark on all cards but the fastest, the 2080.
--
... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,644 |
08-31-2019, 07:13 PM |