|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views
[asc]
|
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| They're actually slower with -O
Quote:
--
Speed.#1.........: 6083.7 MH/s (4.21ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:196 Thr:1024 Vec:2
Speed.#2.........: 8256.4 MH/s (7.03ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:196 Thr:1024 Vec... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-27-2019, 11:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| For sanity's sake here's what version I'm running these with.
Quote:
--
hashcat (v5.1.0) starting in benchmark mode...
--
|
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-28-2019, 12:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| I'll boot it up and test different commands.
I'm only posting NTLM hashes, but I see the same issues across the board with other hash types with single hashes as well. Gimme a few and I'll have new d... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-28-2019, 05:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Ho ho, progress!
Quote:
--
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: NTLM
Hash.Target......: (redacted)
Time.Started.....: Wed Aug 28 13:06:28 2019 (2 secs)
Tim... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-28-2019, 09:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Well shoot.
Ok, then for fast hashes, what's the best way to get full acceleration for rule based attacks? I was playing with the hctune file for a few hours but didn't get any progress. |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-30-2019, 06:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Yeah not sure what that's about. I was playing with the hctune file and couldn't get them to do anything but crater, but since I'm not exactly an expert in tweaking hashcat, that's hardly a surprise. |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-30-2019, 10:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Adding ?b to the mask results in an Integer Overflow Detected in Keyspace of Mask error. So that's a no go. |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-30-2019, 10:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Like I said, it was a broken command and I get that. What I don't understand is why using -w in any form more than halves my speed but -O nearly maxes it out. |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-31-2019, 08:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual n...
| I recently stood up a 4 GPU system, and noticed something strange. When I run a benchmark -
hashcat64.exe -b -m1000
Quote:
--
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
==========================... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-27-2019, 10:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Ok, I've been putting in a lot of time to dink with this since my last reply and I have to admit I have no idea why this is getting such slow speeds with commands that ought to be working.
hashcat6... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-30-2019, 05:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Random thought, it would be nice to have a benchmark that I could specify the type of attack. Right now, the benchmark command just runs a brute force. Maybe an option for mask, hybrid mask etc so you... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-31-2019, 09:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| I'll test that now and post. Thanks! |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-31-2019, 09:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
|
Kryczek Wrote: (09-02-2019, 11:54 AM)
--
Try each card separately? :)
--
Top of page three, already did. |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
09-02-2019, 05:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Yeah, the choice of cards isn't ideal but when you're resource constrained...
So how can I measure RAM/VRAM? I'm not seeing anything in Task Manager that indicates that's an issue, and I'm able to ge... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
09-03-2019, 06:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Ok, new pass with w3 and no mask
Quote:
--
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Quit
Hash.Type........: NTLM
Hash.Target......: (redacted)
Time.Started.....: Wed Aug 28 10:50:32 2019 (20 se... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-28-2019, 07:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| And as a side note, I do appreciate all the help/pointers in the thread. I know how aggravating it can be and I'm trying other things. I think my biggest issue is the "how" hashcat works on the back e... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-30-2019, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| hashcat64.exe -m0 -a3 d:\hashlists\Random\Quillen.txt ?b?b?b?b?b?b?b -w4 -O
Quote:
--
hashcat (v5.1.0) starting...
* Device #1: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled.
This ... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-30-2019, 08:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| *smacks forehead*
I apologize, I thought I had already posted that.
Quote:
--
D:\hashcat>hashcat64.exe -b -m0
hashcat (v5.1.0) starting in benchmark mode...
Benchmarking uses hand-optimize... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-30-2019, 09:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| Ok, so I've been doing a LOT of testing and have a mask attack at this speed now -
Quote:
--
Speed.#1.........: 40525.5 MH/s (8.24ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:512 Thr:256 Vec:4
Speed.#2.........: 2947... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-31-2019, 02:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actual numbers
Post: RE: Discrepancy between Benchmark numbers and actu...
| For giggles I ran the ?b attack on my personal desktop (single 1080ti) and here's what I got
[quote]Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: MD5
Hash.Target......... |
|
XakEp |
hashcat
|
43 |
12,601 |
08-31-2019, 07:33 PM |
