Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum
[asc]
|
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
Post: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/102011983/hashcat%20bugs/fail.png |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,995 |
02-27-2013, 11:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
It's actually a friend's GPU and not mine. He's running Windows 8 with 314.09(the only drivers available for the titan atm).
I'll notify him of that archive. |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,995 |
03-01-2013, 01:19 AM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
Status Update: Those kernels did not work. I deleted the entire kernels folder as well. Same error. Looks like a new version of CUDA is needed or something. |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,995 |
03-01-2013, 05:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: multi hccaps?
Post: RE: multi hccaps?
Just create a .sh file with multiple oclhashcat entries. |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
26,619 |
03-19-2013, 10:28 AM |
|
|
Thread: Autotuning and -a 6 on single GPU
Post: Autotuning and -a 6 on single GPU
I have an Nvidia Geforce GTS 450(slow) and I have a question about autotuning. On IRC I asked atom why -a 6 caused autotuning to tune the -n parameter from 8 to 1 and he answered because the GPU did n... |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
9,255 |
03-30-2013, 05:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Cannot open folder
Post: Cannot open folder
output:
Code:
--
$ ./cudaHashcat-plus64.exe -a 6 -m 2500 test.hccap test ?d?d?d
cudaHashcat-plus v0.14 by atom starting...
Hashes: 1 total, 1 unique salts, 1 unique digests
Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 ... |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,407 |
04-20-2013, 12:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: Cannot open folder
Post: RE: Cannot open folder
That would explain it. Thanks for the reply. |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,407 |
04-21-2013, 01:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: 320.00 - faster for cudaHhashcat?
Post: 320.00 - faster for cudaHhashcat?
I got my friend to run a .bat file that I set up to see whether or not I was delusional about the increase in speed but here are his results:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/102011983/hashcat/3... |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
17,690 |
04-28-2013, 05:19 AM |
|
|
Thread: install oclhashcat-plus on windows
Post: RE: install oclhashcat-plus on windows
You messed up when extracting. |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
24,638 |
05-22-2013, 02:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Is it me or is a titan faster than a 7970 at Whirlpool based on those results? If so, why? |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,766 |
05-22-2013, 02:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
wait for the next version. |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
13,995 |
06-09-2013, 06:11 PM |
|
|
Thread: AMD cards
Post: RE: AMD cards
depends on the hash that you are cracking. for wpa2, -u 128 and -n 16 should work. see: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=oclhashcat_plus |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
4,911 |
06-09-2013, 06:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: hd 6870 and DES performance
Post: RE: hd 6870 and DES performance
Next version of oclHashcat-plus should improve descrypt speeds by 22%. See: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-2268-post-13596.html#pid13596 |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,109 |
07-16-2013, 07:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat plus has stopped working.
Post: RE: OclHashcat plus has stopped working.
mcai8rw2 Wrote: (08-05-2013, 05:42 PM)
--
perhaps i should just install Ubuntu/Backtrack on the PC instead of windows. However my understanding was that the AMD drivers under linux were weak and woul... |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
18,326 |
08-05-2013, 11:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: GTX Titan Support
Post: RE: GTX Titan Support
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
9,499 |
08-10-2013, 08:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slower than version 0.08
Post: RE: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slow...
That speed decrease is slower but not ALOT slower.
Try setting -n to 128 or higher. |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,044 |
08-17-2013, 10:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible minor bug in OclHashcat-Plus
Post: RE: Possible minor bug in OclHashcat-Plus
User Wrote: (08-19-2013, 04:20 PM)
--
I contacted Powercolor giving all the information they needed and seems there is no new bios update for both GPUs. I might check TechPowerUP GPU bios database to... |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,001 |
08-19-2013, 06:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: NVidia driver issue, was: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.15
Kgx Pnqvhm Wrote: (08-25-2013, 03:03 AM)
--
The readme.txt says:
oclHashcat-plus v0.15
=====================
NV users require ForceWare 319.37 or later
As I reported last month, I had trouble... |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
24,562 |
08-25-2013, 04:19 AM |
|
|
Thread: [fingerprint] combinator attack v0.13 bad, v0.15 good FYI upgrade!
Post: RE: [fingerprint] combinator attack v0.13 bad, v0....
you might wish to sort your wordlists by length as suggested by atom in the release notes for 0.15. Actually this is a good idea for any version of oclhashcat. You can use the splitlen utility to do s... |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,274 |
08-28-2013, 02:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: New and learning
Post: RE: New and learning
jb_bak Wrote: (08-27-2013, 03:09 AM)
--
undeath Wrote: (08-26-2013, 10:25 PM)
--
according to epixoip's post one 7970 will do 130kH/s
therefore:
>>> (26**9)/130000/60/60/24
483.3959828148148
... |
|
Mangix |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
22,146 |
08-28-2013, 10:39 PM |