Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from 08 Oct 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.
hashcat Forum › Search
Results

Search Results
Post Author Forum [asc] Replies Views Posted
    Thread: HashCat t-shirt !
Post: RE: HashCat t-shirt !
At the very least, you can loose the = sign. Loosing the "+ 4 GTX970" would make it less busy. Most people might understand the Hash with "password killer/analyzer", but the GTX970 would be lost on...
 rsberzerker User Contributions 7 13,400 04-13-2015, 06:42 AM
    Thread: Email passwords ruleset v0.1
Post: Email passwords ruleset v0.1
I've been trying my hand some of the hashes.org hashes, and notice some are email addresses. That actually makes sense. An email address will (usually) meet the length requirement, and the "@" and "."...
 rsberzerker User Contributions 1 5,234 04-13-2015, 06:32 AM
    Thread: best64.rule contest
Post: RE: best64.rule contest
I vote yes to this too. And as to Kgx's question, probably, but so what? Passwords used change over time, and the rules need to be updated against them.
 rsberzerker Organisation and Events 34 64,134 04-11-2015, 03:15 AM
    Thread: Minimum password length
Post: Minimum password length
I know with hashcat I can specify a minimum password length, but I can't seem to find a similar option with oclhashcat. I'm working on a hybrid attack, and I've already brute forced everything with 7 ...
 rsberzerker Old oclHashcat Support 5 24,934 12-21-2014, 03:26 AM
    Thread: Minimum password length
Post: RE: Minimum password length
Yes, a mask will work for a brute force attack to select only certain length passwords, but it doesn't work for a hybrid attack. For example, my [fake, example only] dictionary contains two words: pas...
 rsberzerker Old oclHashcat Support 5 24,934 12-21-2014, 05:19 AM
    Thread: save md5 generated hashes to the file ?
Post: RE: save md5 generated hashes to the file ?
undeath Wrote: (12-26-2014, 12:29 PM) -- No. If you want to waste your space with rainbow tables go to freerainbowtables.com. -- To add an example, ophcrack has a paid NTLM rainbow table of all pos...
 rsberzerker Old oclHashcat Support 2 5,355 12-27-2014, 07:38 AM
    Thread: Need some direction with combining dictionaries
Post: RE: Need some direction with combining dictionarie...
It can be done with oclhashcat, but it will take some work. You have two options (AFAIK): 1) Use the hashcat utility program combinator to create a new dictionary, then you can use rules with that....
 rsberzerker Old oclHashcat Support 3 12,102 12-28-2014, 05:52 PM
    Thread: Incrementing Brute Force Attack?
Post: RE: Incrementing Brute Force Attack?
epixoip Wrote: (01-01-2015, 07:30 AM) -- You're not going to be able to brute force past 9 characters, let alone 32. -- Epixoip is right. True brute forcing past about 8 characters is not practical...
 rsberzerker Old oclHashcat Support 4 12,081 01-01-2015, 07:59 AM
    Thread: oclHashcat bruteforce
Post: RE: oclHashcat bruteforce
I'm a little late, but instead of -i you could use a file with masks instead. For the example above of 1-7, create a file with the following lines: ?a ?a?a ?a?a?a ?a?a?a?a ?a?a?a?a?a ?a?a?a?a?...
 rsberzerker Old oclHashcat Support 12 19,260 02-05-2015, 03:12 PM
    Thread: No Output of Cracked Hashes
Post: RE: No Output of Cracked Hashes
Generally, the plain wordlists don't crack many, if any, passwords. But combine them with rules and you are more likely to get something. The best64 ruleset, included with oclhashcat, is a good one. J...
 rsberzerker Old oclHashcat Support 10 12,485 02-09-2015, 03:26 AM
    Thread: No Output of Cracked Hashes
Post: RE: No Output of Cracked Hashes
There are several online hash generators. Try giving them a "password" and get the hash. Then be sure the password is the dictionary you are using to attack said hash. This way, you will get to see a ...
 rsberzerker Old oclHashcat Support 10 12,485 02-09-2015, 05:33 AM
    Thread: bug in 1.35?
Post: RE: bug in 1.35?
So bug. Thanks. I guess I stick with 1.33 for now.
 rsberzerker Old oclHashcat Support 3 5,293 04-13-2015, 01:22 AM
    Thread: -w and sessions
Post: -w and sessions
oclhashcat has 3 Workload Profiles: 1 = Reduced performance profile (low latency desktop) 2 = Default performance profile 3 = Tuned performance profile (high latency desktop) It appear...
 rsberzerker Old oclHashcat Support 1 4,315 05-24-2015, 08:24 PM
    Thread: bug in 1.35?
Post: bug in 1.35?
I hadn't noticed 1.35 was out, so I just downloaded it. I have been using 1.33. But when I ran 1.35, it didn't recover anything, while the same run with 1.33 did. Here are the command lines. First I ...
 rsberzerker Old oclHashcat Support 3 5,293 04-13-2015, 01:03 AM
    Thread: MD5 salted hashs
Post: MD5 salted hashs
I've got [mostly] down how to use hashcat (and oclhashcat) on unsalted hashes, so I decided to try something harder, a salted hash. I found a cracked md5:salt hash elsewhere and put that, along with t...
 rsberzerker Old hashcat Support 4 8,165 12-22-2014, 03:46 AM
    Thread: MD5 salted hashs
Post: RE: MD5 salted hashs
epixoip Wrote: (12-22-2014, 04:06 AM) -- Not sure what you're doing wrong. Maybe you have trailing whitespace or something. -- OK, partially solved. I did have some whitespace at the end of the has...
 rsberzerker Old hashcat Support 4 8,165 12-22-2014, 04:48 AM
    Thread: MD5 salted hashs
Post: RE: MD5 salted hashs
That's what I thought. Thanks. If nothing else, I think I finally truly understand salting (as opposed to just being able to define it).
 rsberzerker Old hashcat Support 4 8,165 12-22-2014, 07:18 AM
    Thread: Is it even possible?
Post: RE: Is it even possible?
Well, the character set is 26+26 = 52. Ten characters is 52^10 = 144,555,105,949,057,024 possible passwords. At 10m/sec (which is very low depending on the hash), ~458 years. BUT...10m/sec is low f...
 rsberzerker Old hashcat Support 11 16,222 02-08-2015, 09:19 PM
    Thread: Is it even possible?
Post: RE: Is it even possible?
If you have the hash, you should have the salt too. Hashcat (and oclhashcat), given the right -m parameter, will automatically use the salt. You don't need to crack that.
 rsberzerker Old hashcat Support 11 16,222 02-08-2015, 11:49 PM
    Thread: Is it even possible?
Post: RE: Is it even possible?
Yes. The salt is normally stored with the hash. So if you have access to the hash, you have access to the salt.
 rsberzerker Old hashcat Support 11 16,222 02-10-2015, 03:10 PM