|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Performance difference Win 7 vs Win 10?
Post: RE: Performance difference Win 7 vs Win 10?
| I've done some more experimenting and I'm convinced there are other factors that determine speed besides the video card and hash. When I upgraded my main cracking system to the 1060 card, I took my ol... |
|
rsberzerker |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,723 |
09-19-2017, 05:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: PCI-E 3.0 card in a PCI-E 2.0 mobo
Post: RE: PCI-E 3.0 card in a PCI-E 2.0 mobo
| Thanks for the quick reply. I guess I now know what my next VC will be. |
|
rsberzerker |
Hardware
|
2 |
5,548 |
12-26-2014, 06:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat bruteforce
Post: RE: oclHashcat bruteforce
| I'm a little late, but instead of -i you could use a file with masks instead. For the example above of 1-7, create a file with the following lines:
?a
?a?a
?a?a?a
?a?a?a?a
?a?a?a?a?a
?a?a?a?a?... |
|
rsberzerker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
12 |
19,269 |
02-05-2015, 03:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: No Output of Cracked Hashes
Post: RE: No Output of Cracked Hashes
| Generally, the plain wordlists don't crack many, if any, passwords. But combine them with rules and you are more likely to get something. The best64 ruleset, included with oclhashcat, is a good one. J... |
|
rsberzerker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
12,485 |
02-09-2015, 03:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: No Output of Cracked Hashes
Post: RE: No Output of Cracked Hashes
| There are several online hash generators. Try giving them a "password" and get the hash. Then be sure the password is the dictionary you are using to attack said hash. This way, you will get to see a ... |
|
rsberzerker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
12,485 |
02-09-2015, 05:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Need some direction with combining dictionaries
Post: RE: Need some direction with combining dictionarie...
| It can be done with oclhashcat, but it will take some work. You have two options (AFAIK):
1) Use the hashcat utility program combinator to create a new dictionary, then you can use rules with that.... |
|
rsberzerker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
12,104 |
12-28-2014, 05:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Need Help | SHA256
Post: RE: Need Help | SHA256
| Translation of epixoip's post: Your keyspace is too large for hashcat to handle, even the 64 bit version. There's not enough memory addresses. No you can't get more until an OS and hardware are made t... |
|
rsberzerker |
hashcat
|
5 |
4,896 |
08-14-2017, 02:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MS Office Instant decryption
Post: RE: MS Office Instant decryption
|
philsmd Wrote: (08-21-2017, 08:58 AM)
--
because you probably should use the collider mode 9710 (with mask ?b?b?b?b?b) for instant access to the data
--
Here's a post by Atom with a more detailed e... |
|
rsberzerker |
General Talk
|
9 |
15,344 |
08-26-2017, 07:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Minimum password length
Post: RE: Minimum password length
| Yes, a mask will work for a brute force attack to select only certain length passwords, but it doesn't work for a hybrid attack. For example, my [fake, example only] dictionary contains two words: pas... |
|
rsberzerker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
24,935 |
12-21-2014, 05:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 salted hashs
Post: RE: MD5 salted hashs
|
epixoip Wrote: (12-22-2014, 04:06 AM)
--
Not sure what you're doing wrong. Maybe you have trailing whitespace or something.
--
OK, partially solved. I did have some whitespace at the end of the has... |
|
rsberzerker |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
8,165 |
12-22-2014, 04:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 salted hashs
Post: RE: MD5 salted hashs
| That's what I thought. Thanks. If nothing else, I think I finally truly understand salting (as opposed to just being able to define it). |
|
rsberzerker |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
8,165 |
12-22-2014, 07:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: LINE/ENCODING ERROR
Post: RE: LINE/ENCODING ERROR
| 1) What hash type are you trying to crack?
2) There are example hashes for pretty much every type in the wiki. Check ones you are getting an error with against the example. Does it look the same fo... |
|
rsberzerker |
hashcat
|
9 |
7,528 |
09-21-2017, 02:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LINE/ENCODING ERROR
Post: RE: LINE/ENCODING ERROR
| Comparing your problem hashes to the example hashes, they don't match in format, which is the problem.
For the 2611, you have XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX wh... |
|
rsberzerker |
hashcat
|
9 |
7,528 |
09-27-2017, 02:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: kwprocessor route help
Post: RE: kwprocessor route help
| OK, thanks Atom. Combinator it is. |
|
rsberzerker |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
2 |
3,167 |
08-28-2017, 03:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is my plan a good idea?
Post: RE: Is my plan a good idea?
| Rainbow tables are virtually useless against salted hashes. And even if they weren't, you have to factor in disk access times: How fast can you search those tables vs. how fast is hashcat (and oclhash... |
|
rsberzerker |
General Talk
|
23 |
40,648 |
12-28-2014, 11:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it even possible?
Post: RE: Is it even possible?
| Well, the character set is 26+26 = 52. Ten characters is 52^10 = 144,555,105,949,057,024 possible passwords. At 10m/sec (which is very low depending on the hash), ~458 years.
BUT...10m/sec is low f... |
|
rsberzerker |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
16,228 |
02-08-2015, 09:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it even possible?
Post: RE: Is it even possible?
| If you have the hash, you should have the salt too. Hashcat (and oclhashcat), given the right -m parameter, will automatically use the salt. You don't need to crack that. |
|
rsberzerker |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
16,228 |
02-08-2015, 11:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it even possible?
Post: RE: Is it even possible?
| Yes. The salt is normally stored with the hash. So if you have access to the hash, you have access to the salt. |
|
rsberzerker |
Old hashcat Support
|
11 |
16,228 |
02-10-2015, 03:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Incrementing Brute Force Attack?
Post: RE: Incrementing Brute Force Attack?
|
epixoip Wrote: (01-01-2015, 07:30 AM)
--
You're not going to be able to brute force past 9 characters, let alone 32.
--
Epixoip is right. True brute forcing past about 8 characters is not practical... |
|
rsberzerker |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
12,083 |
01-01-2015, 07:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How To Run Hashcat ON RDP/VPS
Post: RE: How To Run Hashcat ON RDP/VPS
| Seconded Mem5's answer. You're missing the proper video drivers.
Also hashcat-cli64 is from older versions of hashcat and obsolete. Not recommended to use. |
|
rsberzerker |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,625 |
09-26-2017, 02:51 PM |
