Posts: 46
Threads: 9
Joined: Apr 2014
I've been doing some work on generating keyboard walks. Thought I would post here to see if anyone finds the information useful.
Source:
https://github.com/Rich5/Keyboard-Walk-Generators
Blog spam for more detailed explanation:
https://frogstarworldc.com/2014/08/genera...ard-walks/
Posts: 2,927
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2012
Thanks for sharing! At first glance this appears to be very well done.
Posts: 46
Threads: 9
Joined: Apr 2014
(08-15-2014, 02:15 PM)epixoip Wrote: Thanks for sharing! At first glance this appears to be very well done.
Thanks! I've been using method 2 and getting good results for my purposes, but I'm far from an expert at password cracking. If anyone uses this I'd love to hear feedback.
Posts: 5,085
Threads: 227
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,085
Threads: 227
Joined: Apr 2010
Btw using -a 1 is the same as the combinator mode, this way you may save some wordlist space plus you have a nice multiplicator option for fast hashes
Posts: 46
Threads: 9
Joined: Apr 2014
(08-15-2014, 04:44 PM)atom Wrote: Btw using -a 1 is the same as the combinator mode, this way you may save some wordlist space plus you have a nice multiplicator option for fast hashes
very cool! I was trying to leverage rules, but after looking at this,
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-2391.html, I noticed that there are several ways to accomplish the same thing.
Just so I understand, with combinator mode can I input my seed file of 4 length walks and expand them into length 16? I currently get good results with combining the seed file into length 8 then again to 16, but if oclHashcat does this out of the box I'll use that instead.
Posts: 247
Threads: 59
Joined: Mar 2011
08-16-2014, 02:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-16-2014, 07:55 PM by Kgx Pnqvhm.)
Using the hashcat-utils' combinator.exe is likely quicker than combinator.py.
And the new (but undocumented) combinator3.exe creates the in-between 12 character combinations, e.g.:
>combinator3.exe 4_walk_seed.txt 4_walk_seed.txt 4_walk_seed.txt > 12charwalk.txt
Another interesting idea is using the tmesis.pl from Yiannis Chrysanthou's (aka T0XlC) "I have the #cat so I make the rules" presentation at the recent Passwords Con 2014 Las Vegas. (Also in the new, but undocumented hashcat-utils.)
Posts: 46
Threads: 9
Joined: Apr 2014
(08-16-2014, 02:17 PM)Kgx Pnqvhm Wrote: Using the hashcat-utils' combinator.exe is likely quicker than combinator.py.
And the new (but undocumented) combinator3.exe creates the in-between 12 character combinations, e.g.:
>combinator3.exe 4_walk_seed.txt 4_walk_seed.txt 4_walk_seed.txt > 12charwalk.txt
Another interesting idea is using the tmesis.pl from Yiannis Chrysanthou's (aka T0XlC) "I have the #cat so I make the rules" presentation at the recent Passwords Con 2014 Las Vegas. (Also in the new, but undocumented hashcat-utils.)
I agree that combinator.exe is most likely quicker than combinator.py, and I'll give combinator3.exe a try and see how that works out.
Is the talk from T0XIC available somewhere to view?
Posts: 117
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2013
08-17-2014, 05:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-17-2014, 05:12 PM by coolbry95.)
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2014
Thanks