|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL bruteforcing via hcGui
Post: RE: OpenCL bruteforcing via hcGui
| you did not specify a mask, read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/mask_attack |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
10 |
19,979 |
01-19-2012, 06:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL bruteforcing via hcGui
Post: RE: OpenCL bruteforcing via hcGui
| no thats wrong, read the article again pls |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
10 |
19,979 |
01-19-2012, 10:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL bruteforcing via hcGui
Post: RE: OpenCL bruteforcing via hcGui
| start with the following: put "?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d" into the mask and try again |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
10 |
19,979 |
01-20-2012, 01:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL Build Error
Post: RE: OpenCL Build Error
| I cant say it often enough, dont install the SDK...
Try to uninstall it and pray the installer removes the correct opencl.dll |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,673 |
06-15-2012, 12:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL ICD, Windows 10, Intel CPU, Nvidia GPU, hashcat 3.10 (and beta)
Post: RE: OpenCL ICD, Windows 10, Intel CPU, Nvidia GPU,...
| Update your driver on desktop |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
9,205 |
11-11-2016, 11:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL installation on Linux
Post: RE: OpenCL installation on Linux
| Please ask on The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) Forum, it's not a hashcat problem |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
11 |
23,370 |
03-13-2017, 04:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL issue running hashcat
Post: RE: OpenCL issue running hashcat
|
jhc Wrote: (08-26-2016, 09:00 PM)
--
hashdawg Wrote: (08-26-2016, 12:32 PM)
--
Most likely your card is not supported by current version of hashcat.
--
I suspected as much. I suppose I was hoping ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,293 |
08-27-2016, 11:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCl kernel self-test failed when using any version later than v4.2.1 !!
Post: RE: OpenCl kernel self-test failed when using any ...
| There are constant code changes with the goal to have the software more robust and performing better, that's all. One of the changes is misinterpreted by the AMD OpenCL runtime, but that's a problem i... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
29 |
21,222 |
01-31-2019, 10:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCl kernel self-test failed when using any version later than v4.2.1 !!
Post: RE: OpenCl kernel self-test failed when using any ...
| There's not much to say in terms of error message. This error occurs if the self-test hash was not cracked but it should be cracked. That's all we know. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
29 |
21,222 |
02-13-2019, 05:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL Platform #1: Mesa, skipped! No OpenCL compatible devices found
Post: RE: OpenCL Platform #1: Mesa, skipped! No OpenCL c...
| You need to install an OpenCL runtime for your CPU |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
10,263 |
12-26-2016, 11:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL Platform #1: Mesa, skipped! No OpenCL compatible devices found
Post: RE: OpenCL Platform #1: Mesa, skipped! No OpenCL c...
| From main page:
AMD users on Windows require "AMD Radeon Software Crimson Edition" (15.12 or later)
AMD users on Linux require "AMDGPU-Pro Driver" (16.40 or later)
Intel CPU users require "OpenCL... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
10,263 |
12-27-2016, 11:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL Platform #3: The pocl project
Post: RE: OpenCL Platform #3: The pocl project
| If you have Intel OpenCL runtime then pocl will be disabled because its slower and more unstable. If you want to try out pocl remove the Intel OpenCL runtime and then use -D 1,2 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
4,318 |
07-30-2018, 07:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Opencl.dll is missing
Post: RE: Opencl.dll is missing
| You haven't installed the driver properbly, otherwise you would have it located in c:\windows\ or so. Please run driver fusion free version to clean uninstall your current driver setup and then run 13... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
69,955 |
06-13-2013, 12:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenCL.dll Problem
Post: RE: OpenCL.dll Problem
| If you are on NVidia you have to take cudaHashcat, not oclHashcat. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
15,455 |
05-27-2012, 04:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: openLDAP Hashes
Post: RE: openLDAP Hashes
| very nice, answering own questions are the best, gz |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
6,176 |
08-17-2016, 05:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| All right, will do that for oclHashcat-lite and oclHashcat-plus. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
04-10-2012, 05:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| I am not sure, but maybe its just the salt length that differs. With a dynamic salt length parser this problem should disappear. If I am wrong please correct me. In this case I can save some work :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
04-11-2012, 09:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| implemented in latest oclHashcat-lite v0.10 beta. please try |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
05-05-2012, 10:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| Its already done, just wait for the release |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
07-31-2012, 02:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
Post: RE: OpenLDAP SSHA's Dynamic Base64 Parser
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,262 |
09-07-2012, 05:13 PM |
