Please note, this is a STATIC archive of website hashcat.net from October 2020, cach3.com does not collect or store any user information, there is no "phishing" involved.

Hashcat-plus and "not found passwords"
#1
Question 
Hello guy's,sorry my bad english language..i am russian Big Grin , try to explain the problem from bruteforce on hashcat-plus:

I have configuration pc:
GTX 460+4GB+i5 2500/Win7 x32/Forceware 310.70 Driver

Give you an example of my problem:
I have 3 hash's md5:
df892262227f1115c1435215a3c83423 (password = 002545)
fe743d8d97aa7dfc6c93ccdc2e749513 (password = 1234568)
6148680c750be085e790863859c904bb (password = 555887)

Option Attack:
cudaHashcat-plus32.exe --attack-mode 3 --custom-charset1 ?d D:\EGB1\Hashes\test.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1

Charset ?1 = ?d (1234567890)

Result:
[Image: 2332425.jpg]

Other algorithms, the result is the same..
Other type's attack (dictionary,permutation..more) same..

In what could be the problem? Format file with hashlist or what?)

Version 0.45 cat-plus all work's,starting with version 0.50, there was the problem.
#2
(12-20-2012, 10:08 AM)shawn1xftkee Wrote: In what could be the problem? Format file with hashlist or what?)

Version 0.45 cat-plus all work's,starting with version 0.50, there was the problem.

Your mask is set for 8 spaces, and your passes are 6, and 7 in length.
#3
Yes it does not matter, I have a dictionary with only numeric passwords 0 - 9999999 and passwords still finds.
All other passwords are also not find a dictionary and bruteforce attack.
#4
It does matter. Your mask is 8 chars long, and you did not specify to use incremental mode. Therefore it is not trying 0 - 99999999, but rather 00000000 - 99999999.
#5
Question 
Ok)Well, I will give one more example:
Soft:Hashcat Plus 0.6 Version and Hashcat Plus 0.8 Version
Dictionary:Hashkiller.dic
Hash's:
3fc0a7acf087f549ac2b266baf94b8b1 (pass : qwerty123)
4b3aa7141f91bc13d1219ee518c542b5 (pass : adelante)

Preview:
Cat_Plus 0.8

[Image: 23241.jpg]

Cat_Plus 0.6

[Image: 232324v.jpg]

What do you think? Old version works better than the new?
#6
1) Start by using the real new version which is 0.09 right now and make sure that you have the right drivers.
2) Do the same as your first post and like epixoip said, use the incremental switch (-i).
#7
driver/oclhashcat incompatibility problem
#8
All clear now) Thanks.
Adjust the driver for the correct version.