09-16-2020, 06:39 PM
Hi all.
I'm unsure whether I'm able to push higher hashrates than I'm doing atm. The wordlists I'm using is somewhere between 20 mio - 1+ billion words, but it does not seem to effect hashrates that much and I'm just trying to crack a single hash.
I'm primarily speaking of hashrates by running these commands:
or
or using a maskattack, for instance:
I'm aware of -w 3 and -O, but I'm more concerned whether or not I'm producing enough work for optimal gpu acceleration. The above commands produce hashrates in the range of ~240-250 kH/s.
My main thought is whether or not I can reach higher hashrates by passing input different than from what I'm doing or if I should apply rules or do something entirely different. Or maybe I'm doing it right and I'm just limited by hardware and just need someone who has the knowledge to confirm that.
I've experimented with:
Which seemed to produce slightly lower hashrates (~210 kH/s).
Output of hashcat -I:
Output of hashcat -m 22000 -b:
Let me know if you need the output of some command. I've tried to include output from which I thought could be relevant.
I'm unsure whether I'm able to push higher hashrates than I'm doing atm. The wordlists I'm using is somewhere between 20 mio - 1+ billion words, but it does not seem to effect hashrates that much and I'm just trying to crack a single hash.
I'm primarily speaking of hashrates by running these commands:
Code:
hashcat -a 0 -m 22000 myhccapx.hccapx mywordlist.txt
or
Code:
hashcat -a 0 -m 22000 mypmkid.16800 mywordlist.txt
or using a maskattack, for instance:
Code:
hashcat -a 3 -m 22000 mypmkid.16800 ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d?d
I'm aware of -w 3 and -O, but I'm more concerned whether or not I'm producing enough work for optimal gpu acceleration. The above commands produce hashrates in the range of ~240-250 kH/s.
My main thought is whether or not I can reach higher hashrates by passing input different than from what I'm doing or if I should apply rules or do something entirely different. Or maybe I'm doing it right and I'm just limited by hardware and just need someone who has the knowledge to confirm that.
I've experimented with:
Code:
hashcat --stdout mywordlist.txt -r rules/best64.rule | hashcat -m 22000 myhccapx.hccapx
Which seemed to produce slightly lower hashrates (~210 kH/s).
Output of hashcat -I:
Code:
CUDA Info:
==========
CUDA.Version.: 11.0
Backend Device ID #1 (Alias: #2)
Name...........: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Processor(s)...: 20
Clock..........: 1755
Memory.Total...: 3908 MB
Memory.Free....: 3553 MB
OpenCL Info:
============
OpenCL Platform ID #1
Vendor..: NVIDIA Corporation
Name....: NVIDIA CUDA
Version.: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.0.228
Backend Device ID #2 (Alias: #1)
Type...........: GPU
Vendor.ID......: 32
Vendor.........: NVIDIA Corporation
Name...........: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Version........: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA
Processor(s)...: 20
Clock..........: 1755
Memory.Total...: 3908 MB (limited to 977 MB allocatable in one block)
Memory.Free....: 3520 MB
OpenCL.Version.: OpenCL C 1.2
Driver.Version.: 450.66
Output of hashcat -m 22000 -b:
Code:
CUDA API (CUDA 11.0)
====================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, 3557/3908 MB, 20MCU
OpenCL API (OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.0.228) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation]
========================================================================
* Device #2: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, skipped
Benchmark relevant options:
===========================
* --optimized-kernel-enable
Hashmode: 22000 - WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL (Iterations: 4095)
Speed.#1.........: 278.2 kH/s (73.41ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:128 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Let me know if you need the output of some command. I've tried to include output from which I thought could be relevant.